+1 (315) 557-6473 

SPSS Analysis of Complacency Levels in Certified Flight Instructors (CFIs) Using Multiple Regression and Correlation

An in-depth SPSS analysis of complacency levels among Certified Flight Instructors (CFIs) through the lens of multiple regression and correlation analysis. In this study, we delve into the interplay between CFIs' age, the total hours they've logged in training aircraft, and their complacency levels. Let's explore the research questions, preliminary data analysis, primary data analysis, and post-primary data analysis to gain valuable insights into the aviation industry's safety and training practices.

  1. Home
  2. Multiple Regression and Correlation Analysis: SPSS Analysis of Complacency Levels

Problem Statement:

This correlation analysis assignment focuses on using multiple regression and correlation analysis to investigate the relationship between the age of Certified Flight Instructors (CFIs), the total hours they have spent in training aircraft, and their levels of complacency. The primary goal is to address three key research questions:

  1. Is there a significant relationship between CFIs' age (X1), total hours in training aircraft (X2), and their level of complacency (Y)?
  2. Does CFIs' age (X1) significantly predict the level of complacency (Y)?
  3. Does the total number of hours CFIs' logged in their primary training aircraft (X2) significantly predict the level of complacency (Y)?

Solution

  1. Priori Activities
    1. Research Questions
      2. The following are the research questions to be answered by the research
      1. Is there a significant relationship between the CFIs’ age (X1), total hours in training aircraft (X2), and their level of complacency (Y)?
      2. Does CFIs’ age (X1) significantly predict the level of complacency (Y)?
      3. Does the total number of hours CFIs’ logged in their primary training aircraft (X2) significantly predict the level of complacency (Y)?
    2. Sample Size

      3. According to the G-power, the required sample size with 0.15 effect size, 0.05 level of significance, and 0.8 power is 68. The given sample size is sufficient for the study considering the calculated minimum sample size. The given large sample size will increase the credibility of the research result.

    Central and Non Central Distribution


  2. Preliminary Data Analysis

    3. The assumptions of multiple regression are not violated by the data. There exists a linear relationship between the dependent variable (complacency) and the independent variables (CFIs’ age and total number of hours they have logged in their primary training aircraft). Also, the dependent variable is normally distributed. The figures below give the visualization of the linearity and normality assumptions respectively.

    Plot of Age and ComplacencyPlot of Age and Total HourHistogram Plot of CFIs' Complacency


  3. Primary Data Analysis

    4. The tables below give the output of the multiple regression analysis

    Model Summary

       
    Model       		    
    R       		    
    R Square       		    
    Adjusted R Square       		    
    Std. Error of the Estimate   
       
    1       		    
    .251a       		    
    .063       		    
    .054       		    
    2.6097   


    ANOVA

       
    Model       		    
    R       		    
    R Square       		    
    Adjusted R Square       		    
    Std. Error of the Estimate   
       
    1       		    
    .251a       		    
    .063       		    
    .054       		    
    2.6097   

    Coefficients

       
    Model       		    
    R       		    
    R Square       		    
    Adjusted R Square       		    
    Std. Error of the Estimate   
       
    1       		    
    .251a       		    
    .063       		    
    .054       		    
    2.6097   


    1. The R2 value explains the proportion of variance in the dependent variable caused by the independent variables. The R2Y•12 value (0.063) from the model summary table above indicates that CFIs’ age and the total number of hours CFIs’ logged in their primary training aircraft explain 6.3% of the variability in the level of Complacency.

      2. The adjusted R2 also explains the variability in the dependent variable explained by the independent variables but adjusted for the number of independent variables included in the model. The adjusted R2Y•12 value (0.054) shows a decrease in value compared to the R2Y•12 value. This indicates that one of the two independent variables does not significantly improve the model.
      The F-ratio in the ANOVA table tests whether the overall regression model is a good fit for the data. The table shows that the CFIs’ age and total number of hours they have logged in their primary training aircraft statistically significantly predict the level of complacency, F (2, 200) = 6.715, p < 0.05. The model is significant.

    2. The regression model was obtained as;

      3. Level of Complacency = 12.949 + 0.0800 (CFI_Age) + 0.0001(Total_Hour)
      The model indicates that,

      1. The average expected level of complacency is 12.949 if the CFI has not logged in to their primary training aircraft.

      2. The level of complacency increases by 0.08 for every unit increase in the CFIs’ age while the total number of hours CFIs logged in their primary training aircraft is held constant.

      3. Also, for every unit increase in the total number of hours CFIs logged in their primary training aircraft, the level of complacency increases by 0.0001 holding the CFIs’ age constant.

      The output was examined further by investigating the t-statistic and the corresponding p-value to know which of the independent variables significantly predicted the level of complacency. The result revealed that the CFIs’ age significantly predicts the level of complacency t(1) = 3.642, p< 0.05. The total hours in training aircraft do not significantly predict the level of complacency t(1) = -0.919, p>0.05.

    3. The multiple correlation coefficient was obtained as 0.063. The correlation between the level of complacency and CFIs’ age was obtained as 0.243 while the correlation between the total hours in training aircraft and level of complacency was obtained as 0.028

      4. The squared semi-partial correlation coefficient sr21 value of 0.249 indicates that the CFI age increases the variability in the level of complacency by 0.249. The value is significant t(1) = 3.642, p<0.05. Also, the sr22 value -0.063 shows that total hours of in-training aircraft decrease the variability in the level of complacency by 0.063. The variability is not significant t(1) = -9.19, p>0.05

    4. It can be concluded from the results of the analysis that;

      1. There is a significant relationship between the CFIs’ age (X1), total hours in training aircraft (X2), and their level of complacency (Y)

      2. CFIs’ age (X1) significantly predicts the level of complacency (Y)

      3. The total number of hours CFIs logged in their primary training aircraft (X2) does not significantly predict the level of complacency (Y)

  4. Post-Primary Data Analysis

    1. The effect size obtained value of 0.067 indicates that the model's practical application is limited
    2. The sr21 has an effect size of 0.32 and sr22 has an effect size of 0.028 showing a large and small effect size respectively.
    3. The power of the model was obtained to be 0.92 which indicates the significance of the relationship between the three variables.
    4. The power was obtained to be 1 and 0.6724 for both sr21 and sr22 respectively which show that the variation in complacency by the CFI age and total hours in training aircraft is significant.
    5. The overall regression model is significant although with a small coefficient of determination. The model can be used for decision but the emphasis has to be placed on the CFI age to get an optimal estimate of the level of complacency.